Shouldn’t everyday be Lady’s Day? Am I just being overly chivalrous again, and trying to get in favour with the fairer sex? Not exactly but I am always trying to get myself out of the dog house!
Let me explain what I’m on about, now follow me on this because I’m about to go off on a bit of a tangent here. How many times have you overheard a conversation at the race course or the bookies or read a statement on a forum where someone pontificates about not backing a horse because the jockey is a woman? The horse having three legs is a valid reason for not backing the horse but not backing the horse because there’s a woman in the saddle well that’s plain sexist! Surely just because the jockey is a woman doesn’t make her any less able and skilled to bring the horse home in front than her male counter parts, does it? Well obviously some people think lady jockeys are inferior to male jockeys, and all I can say is that’s their loss and I mean that quite literally.
However this did make me think, what if these punters of prejudice have a point, what if the ladies can’t compete as jockeys with the men, what if they just don’t have what it takes, what if they can’t cut the mustard. That would be a blow to the feminist movement, and it would certainly get us analysts working away with angles and systems every time a lady jockey is declared in a race.
So this now begs the question are the ladies as good as, if not better than, their male colleagues as jockeys? The only way to settle this answer is to turn to the trusty stats! Let’s take a look at the top five male and female jockeys of last year’s flat season and see what the statistics have to say about this. For this exercise we’ll take the top 5 as ordered by the number of wins registered, (which in my opinion is not necessarily the best way to determine the top jockeys, but if I go off on this subject and start ranting about statistics there may be no return!)
In the Men’s Corner
|
Jockey
|
Runs
|
Wins
|
Strike Rate
|
AVG Winning SP
|
AVG SP
|
|
Ryan Moore
|
874
|
137
|
15%
|
4.14
|
7.23
|
|
Richard Hughes
|
695
|
95
|
13%
|
5.32
|
9.45
|
|
Paul Hanagan
|
773
|
82
|
10%
|
5.74
|
12.16
|
|
Jamie Spencer
|
583
|
72
|
12%
|
3.74
|
8.25
|
|
Darryll Holland
|
517
|
67
|
12%
|
5.57
|
12.12
|
In the Lady’s Corner
|
Jockey
|
Runs
|
Wins
|
Strike Rate
|
AVG Winning SP
|
AVG SP
|
|
Hayley Turner
|
470
|
42
|
8%
|
7.45
|
17.90
|
|
Kristy Milczarek
|
225
|
23
|
10%
|
10.06
|
17.76
|
|
Kelly Harrison
|
256
|
16
|
6%
|
9.28
|
27.04
|
|
Catherine Gannon
|
280
|
13
|
4%
|
19.73
|
32.60
|
|
Sophie Doyle
|
102
|
6
|
5%
|
8.22
|
28.85
|
Well well well, this doesn’t look good for the lady jockeys does it? At first sight it looks as though the man get more rides, more winners and a better strike rate than the ladies, but wait a minute things aren’t over yet there’s more to this story that first meets the eye! Look at the average SPs that the ladies are returning these are far high than those of the men. This would indicate that the quality of the horses or the preserved chance of the lady’s mounts winning is far lower than that of the men. So the ladies are at a disadvantage having lower quality horses to compete on, that being the case you would expect their strike rate to lower. Better horses means more winners, it’s logical, so we need to compare like for like. We need to level the playing field so to speak, the only way to do that is to look at those rides that are comparable, and the most obvious way to do that is to look at those horses that went off favourite in their race. So let’s have a look at how these two set of jockeys fair when we look at just those horses that went off as favourites. This way we know that all the jockeys have a similar quality of ride, or at least a similar chance of winning.
In the Men’s Corner (just the favourites)
|
Jockey
|
Runs
|
Wins
|
Strike Rate
|
AVG Winning SP
|
AVG SP
|
|
Ryan Moore
|
232
|
73
|
31%
|
1.84
|
2.28
|
|
Richard Hughes
|
122
|
40
|
32%
|
2.11
|
2.42
|
|
Paul Hanagan
|
119
|
37
|
31%
|
1.62
|
2.29
|
|
Jamie Spencer
|
103
|
34
|
33%
|
2.23
|
2.65
|
|
Darryll Holland
|
60
|
21
|
23%
|
2.52
|
2.52
|
In the Lady’s Corner (just the favourites)
|
Jockey
|
Runs
|
Wins
|
Strike Rate
|
AVG Winning SP
|
AVG SP
|
|
Hayley Turner
|
41
|
12
|
29%
|
1.46
|
2.89
|
|
Kristy Milczarek
|
16
|
5
|
31%
|
3.25
|
2.78
|
|
Kelly Harrison
|
15
|
5
|
30%
|
2.75
|
2.78
|
|
Catherine Gannon
|
6
|
2
|
30%
|
3
|
2.93
|
|
Sophie Doyle
|
4
|
1
|
15%
|
4
|
4.25
|
Right….now we see a totally different story! If we put the ladies on a horse that has the same chance of winning as that of the gents’ then it does appear that they can hold their corner. Look at the strike rates now that we have filtered down the list of runners to just those that went off favourite and both the ladies and gents have very similar strike rates, which would lead me to believe that there is no absolutely no truth in the statement that male jockeys are better than female jockeys. What’s even more interesting is the prejudice against the lady jockey is such that the SP returned for the lady’s when on the favourite is in fact higher than that for their male counter parts; in fact it’s around 25% higher! Now this is worth taking note of!
Now I haven’t done the number crunching but I’m almost certain that the same is going to be true of amateurs and apprentices. Who like the lady jockeys are not fashionable riders, unlike those gents at the top of the jockeys league table. Unfortunately many punters cannot look past what is fashionable and what is not to see the truth beneath; if they did they would see a whole new field of betting opportunities at great value opening up to them.
So I guess the moral of this tale, if there is one, is that just because the jockey isn’t fashionable it isn’t an excuse not to back a horse, the less fashionable jockeys, if given the opportunity are just as skilful and able to steer home a winner as those in favour; but often at far better prices than if a more fashionable rider was on board. So don’t dismiss a horse solely on the fact the person in the saddle is not a ‘top’ or fashionable jockey, as you’ll miss out on some cracking bets that are at far better value for money prices.